News By Zenvor News
Observers note that one of the key conditions being proposed is to ensure that no future war or aggression takes place. For this purpose, a credible and enforceable international guarantee is being demanded.
Another major condition is the complete dismantling of American military bases in the Middle East. It is being insisted that all U.S. military installations in the region be fully shut down.
In addition, there is a demand for reparations and withdrawal. The countries accused of initiating the conflict—namely the United States and Israel—are being asked to retreat from their current positions. They are also required to fully compensate Iran for the financial and human losses it suffered during the war.
Furthermore, there is a call to end conflicts across regional fronts. This includes not only Iran but also other areas such as Lebanon, Yemen, and additional locations where ongoing conflicts and militant activities must be completely halted.
Another important proposal concerns the Strait of Hormuz, where a new international legal framework is suggested to regulate shipping and security, ensuring the protection of Iran’s strategic interests.
An additional demand is to curb anti-Iran propaganda. Media outlets involved in such activities should face legal action, and individuals responsible should be deported from the respective countries.
U.S. Counter-Demands
According to American media reports, the United States has put forward its own set of conditions. These include:
- The complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program
- A total halt to uranium enrichment at all levels
- The destruction of existing nuclear stockpiles
- Strict limitations on Iran’s missile program, including a complete ban on ballistic missile development and testing
- Ending support for proxy groups in the region, such as Hezbollah and the Houthis, including financial and military assistance
It is also reported that former President Donald Trump has issued an ultimatum, giving Iran a deadline of March 27, 2026, to comply with these conditions. Failure to do so could result in targeted attacks on Iran’s power plants and energy infrastructure.
Analysis of the Situation
Experts suggest that the demands from both sides are largely unrealistic and difficult to implement. Similar conditions previously imposed by the United States were designed in such a way that Iran could not reasonably accept them. As a result, tensions escalated into a war-like situation.
It is believed that both Iran and the United States are now aware that these demands are not practically enforceable. If this was not clear before, it has likely become evident after the current escalation.
The key question now is: what path will the situation take moving forward?
Analysts argue that the United States is increasingly stuck in a difficult situation. The economic burden on American citizens is rising, and internal criticism of Donald Trump and his administration is growing. With upcoming midterm elections, historical trends suggest that ruling parties tend to lose seats when economic pressures—such as a strong dollar—intensify. Surveys indicate that losses of 20 to 24 seats are possible under such conditions.
Conclusion
The current standoff reflects deeply entrenched positions on both sides, with demands that leave little room for compromise. Without a shift toward more realistic and mutually acceptable conditions, the risk of further escalation remains high.